Bridleway not downgraded
Language: English Series: Times ; 6/7/89 p43Publication details: 1989Subject(s): Summary: In R v SOS for the Environment , ex parte Burrows and Another QBD 30 June 1989 it was held that the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 had no power to downgrade a bridleway to a footpath on the ground that it had been wrongly described in a definitive map and statement.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB2526-10 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 71418-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2525-17 Damages for tenancy loss | WB2525-18 Lodgers or tenants? | WB2526-09 CPO challenge fails | WB2526-10 Bridleway not downgraded | WB2526-13 Pre-emption agreement | WB2526-14 Consent survives sub-lease expiry | WB2526-17 Enforcement notice fails |
In R v SOS for the Environment , ex parte Burrows and Another QBD 30 June 1989 it was held that the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 had no power to downgrade a bridleway to a footpath on the ground that it had been wrongly described in a definitive map and statement.