Section 26 notice
Language: English Series: EGCS ; 1988 146Publication details: 1988Subject(s): Summary: In Shelley and others v United Artists Corporation Ltd , ChD 2 November 1988, it was held that the defendants ceased to be the competent landlord on 30 July when they served their section 26 notice as they specified a date for a new tenancy less than 14 months ahead and the defendants were not estopped from denying that they were not the competent landlord despite realisation of their solicitors in November 1987 that the plaintiffs had named the wrong landlord.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2446-32 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 72133-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2446-29 Building on safer foundations | WB2446-30 Rent acts | WB2446-31 Rent review | WB2446-32 Section 26 notice | WB2446-33 Conditions by law | WB2446-34 Inner city enterprise | WB2446-35 Stimulating urban renewal in Leeds |
In Shelley and others v United Artists Corporation Ltd , ChD 2 November 1988, it was held that the defendants ceased to be the competent landlord on 30 July when they served their section 26 notice as they specified a date for a new tenancy less than 14 months ahead and the defendants were not estopped from denying that they were not the competent landlord despite realisation of their solicitors in November 1987 that the plaintiffs had named the wrong landlord.