Recovery of service charges
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; 1988 EGCS 150Publication details: 1988Subject(s): Summary: In Laimond Property Investment Ltd v Arlington Park Mansions Ltd , CA 4 November 1988, it was held that the parties had expressly agreed how the outgoings and service charges would be apportioned, and they agreed the sum determined by the managing agents . The vendors could therefore not seek to recover the disputed charges after completion date as they were clearly within clause 22 of their sale agreement .| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB2446-44 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 72211-1001 |
In Laimond Property Investment Ltd v Arlington Park Mansions Ltd , CA 4 November 1988, it was held that the parties had expressly agreed how the outgoings and service charges would be apportioned, and they agreed the sum determined by the managing agents . The vendors could therefore not seek to recover the disputed charges after completion date as they were clearly within clause 22 of their sale agreement .