References
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (9310) 13 March 1993, 149(1)Publication details: 1993Subject(s): Summary: Discusses the "Spring v Guardian Assurance" case where the plaintiff sought damages on three different grounds : malicious falsehood, breach of an implied contract term and the tort of negligence because the defendant wrote a bad and inaccurate reference. The judge held that negligence was broad enough to encompass the claim.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2911-61 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 72527-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2911-58 Direct professional access | WB2911-59 Jonas takes initiative abroad | WB2911-60 Personnel assets | WB2911-61 References | WB2911-62 Threats to PSA privatisation | WB2911-64 Rating of plant and machinery | WB2911-65 The value of advice |
Discusses the "Spring v Guardian Assurance" case where the plaintiff sought damages on three different grounds : malicious falsehood, breach of an implied contract term and the tort of negligence because the defendant wrote a bad and inaccurate reference. The judge held that negligence was broad enough to encompass the claim.