Ball v Waveney DC
Language: English Series: Rating & Valuation Reporter ; (1993) 33 RVR 190-191(2)Publication details: 1993Subject(s): Summary: LT 6 April 1993. Dispute arose during compulsory purchase proceedings over the level of compensation payable. The site, formerly residential, was vacant due to enemy action in the Second World War, and valuation depended on the use to which the land may be put. W asserted that the site was too small for a house while B argued that he could claim the planning assumption most favourable to him under the Land Compensation Act 1961. LT agreed with his claim for notional rebuilding of a small dwelling and granted him £800 plus costs.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS49779 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 72723-1001 |
LT 6 April 1993. Dispute arose during compulsory purchase proceedings over the level of compensation payable. The site, formerly residential, was vacant due to enemy action in the Second World War, and valuation depended on the use to which the land may be put. W asserted that the site was too small for a house while B argued that he could claim the planning assumption most favourable to him under the Land Compensation Act 1961. LT agreed with his claim for notional rebuilding of a small dwelling and granted him £800 plus costs.