Inntrepreneur Estates (GL) Ltd v Boyes & others
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (9347) 27 November 1993, 140-146(7)Publication details: 1993Subject(s): Summary: CA 28 July 1993. B were assignees of a public house lease, which tied the defendants to purchasing certain drinks from the landlord (I). The rent was reviewed following suspension of some of these terms. B failed to pay rent and I claimed possession and arrears. B`s defence that the tie provisions were not severable, the lease was in breach of Article 85(2) of the Treaty of Rome, and that the rent should therefore be lower was accepted by the High Court. I appealed. Appeal allowed, the tie clauses were clearly severable, and their invalidity did not jeopardise the lease and its rent.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS49825 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 72881-1001 |
CA 28 July 1993. B were assignees of a public house lease, which tied the defendants to purchasing certain drinks from the landlord (I). The rent was reviewed following suspension of some of these terms. B failed to pay rent and I claimed possession and arrears. B`s defence that the tie provisions were not severable, the lease was in breach of Article 85(2) of the Treaty of Rome, and that the rent should therefore be lower was accepted by the High Court. I appealed. Appeal allowed, the tie clauses were clearly severable, and their invalidity did not jeopardise the lease and its rent.