Valuer`s duty of care
Language: English Series: Times ; 5/2/87 p18Publication details: 1987Subject(s): Summary: In Sutcliffe and Another v Sayer CA 3 February 1987 it was held that an estate agent when making a valuation of a house was neither negligent nor in breach of contract by failing to warn the purchasers of the likely difficulties that would arise when they wished to resell the property.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2306-40 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 7646-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2306-36 Thames Corridor report | WB2306-37 Farm shop stays open | WB2306-39 Solicitor`s negligence | WB2306-40 Valuer`s duty of care | WB2306-43 Property centre for Scotland | WB2306-44 Securitisation | WB2306-47 Australian property report |
In Sutcliffe and Another v Sayer CA 3 February 1987 it was held that an estate agent when making a valuation of a house was neither negligent nor in breach of contract by failing to warn the purchasers of the likely difficulties that would arise when they wished to resell the property.