Landlord and Tenant Act 1954
Language: English Series: EGCS ; 1991 51 (11/5/91)Publication details: 1991Subject(s): Summary: In Grosvenor Estate Belgravia v Cochran , CA 3 May 1991, it was held that the appellant, at the end of the headlease was not a tenant of the flat on a protected tenancy because the flat was not let as a separate dwelling within the meaning of Rent Act 1977 s1 . For the purposes of Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 s22 the letting under which the appellant held the basement was under the headlease: that subsection did not enable the court to hold that the basement was ever let as a dwelling .| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2719-31 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 74112-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2719-28 Free market for tenancies | WB2719-29 Tenancy rules face the axe | WB2719-30 Repairing obligations | WB2719-31 Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 | WB2719-32 Rent Act 1977 | WB2719-33 Service-charge payments | WB2719-34 Sunday trading law |
In Grosvenor Estate Belgravia v Cochran , CA 3 May 1991, it was held that the appellant, at the end of the headlease was not a tenant of the flat on a protected tenancy because the flat was not let as a separate dwelling within the meaning of Rent Act 1977 s1 . For the purposes of Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 s22 the letting under which the appellant held the basement was under the headlease: that subsection did not enable the court to hold that the basement was ever let as a dwelling .