Procuring breach of contract
Language: English Series: EGCS ; 1988 116Publication details: 1988Subject(s): Summary: In Edwin Hill & Partners v First National Finance Corporation Plc , CA 22 July 1988, it was held that although the respondents had remedies under a legal charge of property which would have interfered with the appellants contract, they were not bound to exercise those remedies in defence of their rights.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2431-24 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 74231-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
In Edwin Hill & Partners v First National Finance Corporation Plc , CA 22 July 1988, it was held that although the respondents had remedies under a legal charge of property which would have interfered with the appellants contract, they were not bound to exercise those remedies in defence of their rights.