Locality
Language: English Series: EGCS ; 1991 53 (11/5/91) | Estates Times ; no 1095 10/5/91 p2(2)Publication details: 1991Subject(s): Summary: In Shearson Lehman Brothers Ltd and others v Humphrys (VO) and another, LT 25 April 1991, it was held that `locality` in rating valuations can mean a large area so assessments of comparable modern offices in the City and Islington were admissible and relevant, It should not be assumed that the premises existed in a 1973 setting. (Transcript available on loan from the LIS)| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2719-55 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 74245-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2719-52 Rating trap | WB2719-53 Surveyors prefer caution | WB2719-54 Valuation values | WB2719-55 Locality | WB2719-56 Farm waste | WB2719-57 Green bonus for planting trees urged | WB2719-58 Set-aside strategy |
In Shearson Lehman Brothers Ltd and others v Humphrys (VO) and another, LT 25 April 1991, it was held that `locality` in rating valuations can mean a large area so assessments of comparable modern offices in the City and Islington were admissible and relevant, It should not be assumed that the premises existed in a 1973 setting. (Transcript available on loan from the LIS)