R v Dairy Produce Quota Tribunal for England and Wales ex parte Davies
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; 283(6344) 25 July 1987, 463-466(3)Publication details: 1987Subject(s): Summary: QBD 26 February 1987. Application by (F) for judicial review of a Tribunal decision for determination of F`s secondary milk quota pursuant to a development claim. The claim was submitted in respect of capital investment calculated to produce a substantial increase in milk production. The Tribunal rejected F`s appeal from a local panel who estimated that planned investment would result in an increase in production equal to that of 13 milking cows. F disagreed. Both parties agreed that at the end of the development there would be 60 cows. The dispute centres on how many cows there were during the base period. F challenged the validity of the method applied and the absence of reasons for arriving at 13. QBD held that the Tribunal`s determination indicated a use of the 5,000 litres standard for a purpose for which it was not intended and quashed the decision on the basis that reasons were not adequately given.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS37951 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 7766-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
QBD 26 February 1987. Application by (F) for judicial review of a Tribunal decision for determination of F`s secondary milk quota pursuant to a development claim. The claim was submitted in respect of capital investment calculated to produce a substantial increase in milk production. The Tribunal rejected F`s appeal from a local panel who estimated that planned investment would result in an increase in production equal to that of 13 milking cows. F disagreed. Both parties agreed that at the end of the development there would be 60 cows. The dispute centres on how many cows there were during the base period. F challenged the validity of the method applied and the absence of reasons for arriving at 13. QBD held that the Tribunal`s determination indicated a use of the 5,000 litres standard for a purpose for which it was not intended and quashed the decision on the basis that reasons were not adequately given.