Covenant
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; 1994 EGCS 20 (19/2/94)Publication details: 1994Subject(s): Summary: "Green and another v Carter" CA 1 February 1994 questioned whether a restrictive covenant, that lower apartment of a property should be used as a single private residence, applied to outbuildings which the appellant wanted to develop. Held that outbuildings such as the games and laundry rooms intended for domestic use were covered by the covenant; others such as the stable designed for non-domestic use did not. Right of way to stable block determined.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3008-30 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 76163-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB3007-42 Hunting ban illegal | WB3008-01 Date of appointment of arbitrator | WB3008-29 Rent review clause | WB3008-30 Covenant | WB3008-34 Injunction | WB3008-35 Mandatory injunction | WB3008-43 Agricultural property |
"Green and another v Carter" CA 1 February 1994 questioned whether a restrictive covenant, that lower apartment of a property should be used as a single private residence, applied to outbuildings which the appellant wanted to develop. Held that outbuildings such as the games and laundry rooms intended for domestic use were covered by the covenant; others such as the stable designed for non-domestic use did not. Right of way to stable block determined.