SoS Transport v Birse-Farr Joint Venture
Language: English Series: Construction Industry Law Letter ; (1994) CILL 903-904(2)Publication details: 1994Subject(s): Summary: Commercial Court 7 April 1993. Dispute had arisen between B, a contractor, and S over a variation to the concrete specification. At arbitration B`s contention that it was under certified by the engineer to the sum of £291,213 was supported. B also claimed compound interest under ICE Conditions 5th editions Cl 60(6) for both the present and previous under-certifications. Interest was granted and S appealed. The court agreed that Cl 60(6) did not allow for compound interest.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS50604 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 76625-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Commercial Court 7 April 1993. Dispute had arisen between B, a contractor, and S over a variation to the concrete specification. At arbitration B`s contention that it was under certified by the engineer to the sum of £291,213 was supported. B also claimed compound interest under ICE Conditions 5th editions Cl 60(6) for both the present and previous under-certifications. Interest was granted and S appealed. The court agreed that Cl 60(6) did not allow for compound interest.