Little v Courage Ltd
Language: English Series: Property and Compensation Reports ; (1995) 70 P&CR 469-479(11)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: CA 21 December 1994. Little (L) wanted to exercise the option in his lease to renew for a further five years, Courage (C) agreed. However C later claimed that L had not submitted a business plan with his application, as required in the lease and his application was therefore refused. Held that L had only to `agree` to a plan, not submit one, so if C did not present L with a plan to sign C could not refuse L`s application to extend the lease on the grounds of there being no business plan attached.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS54023 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 7930-1001 |
CA 21 December 1994. Little (L) wanted to exercise the option in his lease to renew for a further five years, Courage (C) agreed. However C later claimed that L had not submitted a business plan with his application, as required in the lease and his application was therefore refused. Held that L had only to `agree` to a plan, not submit one, so if C did not present L with a plan to sign C could not refuse L`s application to extend the lease on the grounds of there being no business plan attached.