Transferring confusion
Language: English Series: Building ; 260(7916) 10 November 1995, 41(1)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: Considers the confusion caused by the decision in the European Court in the case of "Ledernes Hovedorganisation v Dansk Arbejdsgiverforening" which contradicted earlier decisions that stated contracting-out activities (including CCT) came under the Acquired Rights Directive, TUPE in the UK.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS54034 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 8002-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Considers the confusion caused by the decision in the European Court in the case of "Ledernes Hovedorganisation v Dansk Arbejdsgiverforening" which contradicted earlier decisions that stated contracting-out activities (including CCT) came under the Acquired Rights Directive, TUPE in the UK.