Image from Google Jackets

Enfield LBC v Castles Estates Agents Ltd

Language: English Series: Property, planning & compensation reports ; (1997) 3 PCR 343-350(8)Publication details: 1997Subject(s): Summary: QBD 16 February 1996. C was prosecuted on two summonses, alleging a contravention of the Property Misdescriptions Act 1991 s1(1) and the Property Misdescriptions (Specified Matters) Order 1992, concerning fitness of purpose to which the building could be put. E had appealed against a decision of not guilty for C. Appeal dismissed.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report London Journal article ABS56771 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 77587-1001

QBD 16 February 1996. C was prosecuted on two summonses, alleging a contravention of the Property Misdescriptions Act 1991 s1(1) and the Property Misdescriptions (Specified Matters) Order 1992, concerning fitness of purpose to which the building could be put. E had appealed against a decision of not guilty for C. Appeal dismissed.