Fair rents - quantification of scarcity and `working through`
Language: English Series: Journal of the Institute of Rating Officers ; 28(1) April 1997, 5-8(4)Publication details: 1997Subject(s):- COMPARABLES
- CURTIS AND ANOTHER V LONDON RENT ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE
- FAIR RENTS
- NORTHUMBERLAND AND DURHAM PROPERTY TRUST LTD V LONDON RENT ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE AND BORKOWSKI
- NORTHUMBERLAND AND DURHAM PROPERTY TRUST LTD V LONDON RENT ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE AND BULLOCK
- NORTHUMBERLAND AND DURHAM PROPERTY TRUST LTD V LONDON RENT ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE AND COWDERY AND ANOTHER
- OPEN MARKET RENTS
- QUANTIFICATION OF SCARCITY
- R V LONDON RENT ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE EX P WELLS
- RALSTON V EAST MIDLANDS RAC AND PLUMMER
- RENT ACT 1977 S70(2)
- RENT ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE
- SPATH HOLME LTD V GREATER MANCHESTER AND LANCASHIRE RENT ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE
- RATING AND VALUATION
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS56910 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 78005-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Discusses recent cases concerning fair rents and the quantification of scarcity, following the decision in "Spath Holme v Greater Manchester and Lancashire Rent Assessment Committee". Outlines the best way to quantify scarcity.