Break clause
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (1997) EGCS 14 (26/4/97)Publication details: 1997Subject(s): Summary: "Aberdeen Steak Houses plc v Crown Estate Commissioners" ChD 8 February 1997. The defendant landlord wanted to redevelop a property. Notice quoting break clause was sent to the plaintiff tenant. Plaintiff claimed clause was invalid, application was dismissed. Defendant had satisfied the service of notice.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3317-26 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 78081-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB3314-69 Retail development | WB3315-24 Negligence without fraud | WB3317-18 Excessive user | WB3317-26 Break clause | WB3317-33 Agency | WB3317-34 Breach of warranty | WB3317-35 Undue influence |
"Aberdeen Steak Houses plc v Crown Estate Commissioners" ChD 8 February 1997. The defendant landlord wanted to redevelop a property. Notice quoting break clause was sent to the plaintiff tenant. Plaintiff claimed clause was invalid, application was dismissed. Defendant had satisfied the service of notice.