Hunter v Canary Wharf
Language: English Series: New Property Cases ; [1997] NPC 64(4)Publication details: 1997Subject(s): Summary: HL 25 April 1997. Erecting a building which causes interference with the reception of television signals does not constitute an actionable nuisance. Only those with a right in land or a right of exclusive possession to it have standing to sue in nuisance. HEADNOTE FROM JOURNAL - NOT TO BE PHOTOCOPIED.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | X83780 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 78162-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
HL 25 April 1997. Erecting a building which causes interference with the reception of television signals does not constitute an actionable nuisance. Only those with a right in land or a right of exclusive possession to it have standing to sue in nuisance. HEADNOTE FROM JOURNAL - NOT TO BE PHOTOCOPIED.