Foskett v McKeown
Language: English Series: New Property Cases ; [1997] NPC 83Publication details: 1997Subject(s): Summary: CA 21 May 1997. Purchasers whose vendor has in breach of trust invested their deposits into a greatly appreciating asset held in trust for a third party, are entitled to the return of their deposit plus interest, but not to a pro tanto share in the asset. Taken from headnote. NO PHOTOCOPYING ALLOWED.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | X84400 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 78791-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
CA 21 May 1997. Purchasers whose vendor has in breach of trust invested their deposits into a greatly appreciating asset held in trust for a third party, are entitled to the return of their deposit plus interest, but not to a pro tanto share in the asset. Taken from headnote. NO PHOTOCOPYING ALLOWED.