Occupier not liable for hazard
Language: English Series: Times ; 9 June 1997, 40(1)Publication details: 1997Subject(s): Summary: "Rowe v Herman & others" CA 7 May 1997. An occupier employing an independent contractor to carry out works on his land does not owe a duty of care to ensure that there are no hazards left by the contractor that could injure a third party.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3323-05 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 78870-1001 |
"Rowe v Herman & others" CA 7 May 1997. An occupier employing an independent contractor to carry out works on his land does not owe a duty of care to ensure that there are no hazards left by the contractor that could injure a third party.