Suzen judgment creates fresh uncertainty on `relevant transfers
Language: English Series: Facilities Management ; 4(5) June 1997, 16-17(2)Publication details: 1997Subject(s): Summary: The judgment in "Ayse Suzen v Zehnacker" creates fresh uncertainties as to what is a `relevant transfer` for the purposes of TUPE. Considers the background to the decision highlighting relevant parts of the judgment with guidance on how employers should protect themselves when outsourcing contracts.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS57173 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 78885-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
The judgment in "Ayse Suzen v Zehnacker" creates fresh uncertainties as to what is a `relevant transfer` for the purposes of TUPE. Considers the background to the decision highlighting relevant parts of the judgment with guidance on how employers should protect themselves when outsourcing contracts.