Landlord and tenant: break clause
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; [1997] EGCS 97 (28/6/97)Publication details: 1997Subject(s): Summary: "Nocton Ltd v Water Hall Group" ChD 19 June 1997. The owner of a quarry granted a lease to a tenant containing a clause entitling the tenant to break the lease when all limestone `capable of extraction has been removed`. Once the limestone became uneconomical to extract the tenant gave notice. The tenant contended that `capable of extraction` meant economically rather than physically capable. Judgment for the landlord.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3326-28 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 79379-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB3325-52 Taxation - VAT | WB3326-07 Compulsory purchase | WB3326-27 Compensation | WB3326-28 Landlord and tenant: break clause | WB3326-29 Business tenancy | WB3326-35 Town and country planning | WB3326-39 Damages |
"Nocton Ltd v Water Hall Group" ChD 19 June 1997. The owner of a quarry granted a lease to a tenant containing a clause entitling the tenant to break the lease when all limestone `capable of extraction has been removed`. Once the limestone became uneconomical to extract the tenant gave notice. The tenant contended that `capable of extraction` meant economically rather than physically capable. Judgment for the landlord.