Elle Ltd v Bliss (VO)
Language: English Series: Rating Appeals ; [1997] RA 243-257(8)Publication details: 1997Subject(s): Summary: LT 30 April 1997. During 1989 ratepayer E carried out alterations and general refurbishment of the subject premises. The works were not completed until February 1992, during which time E used some of the building for storage of non-building work materials. In August 1989 E proposed a reduction in the assessment for rates until alterations were complete. £1,900 gross value and £1,555 rateable value were agreed. A further proposal of October 1989 was agreed for specifying nil assessment. The property was entered in the 1990 rating list as being effective from 1 January 1991. E later proposed revised value, as part of the premises were used for storage. From 19 February 1992 assessment was agreed at £54,000. In 1995 B issued certificate specifying £27 rateable value for purposes of transitional relief. E`s appeal to the local valuation tribunal dismissed. Appeal to LT upheld.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS57390 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 79760-1001 |
LT 30 April 1997. During 1989 ratepayer E carried out alterations and general refurbishment of the subject premises. The works were not completed until February 1992, during which time E used some of the building for storage of non-building work materials. In August 1989 E proposed a reduction in the assessment for rates until alterations were complete. £1,900 gross value and £1,555 rateable value were agreed. A further proposal of October 1989 was agreed for specifying nil assessment. The property was entered in the 1990 rating list as being effective from 1 January 1991. E later proposed revised value, as part of the premises were used for storage. From 19 February 1992 assessment was agreed at £54,000. In 1995 B issued certificate specifying £27 rateable value for purposes of transitional relief. E`s appeal to the local valuation tribunal dismissed. Appeal to LT upheld.