Image from Google Jackets

Elle Ltd v Bliss (VO)

Language: English Series: Rating Appeals ; [1997] RA 243-257(8)Publication details: 1997Subject(s): Summary: LT 30 April 1997. During 1989 ratepayer E carried out alterations and general refurbishment of the subject premises. The works were not completed until February 1992, during which time E used some of the building for storage of non-building work materials. In August 1989 E proposed a reduction in the assessment for rates until alterations were complete. £1,900 gross value and £1,555 rateable value were agreed. A further proposal of October 1989 was agreed for specifying nil assessment. The property was entered in the 1990 rating list as being effective from 1 January 1991. E later proposed revised value, as part of the premises were used for storage. From 19 February 1992 assessment was agreed at £54,000. In 1995 B issued certificate specifying £27 rateable value for purposes of transitional relief. E`s appeal to the local valuation tribunal dismissed. Appeal to LT upheld.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report London Journal article ABS57390 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 79760-1001

LT 30 April 1997. During 1989 ratepayer E carried out alterations and general refurbishment of the subject premises. The works were not completed until February 1992, during which time E used some of the building for storage of non-building work materials. In August 1989 E proposed a reduction in the assessment for rates until alterations were complete. £1,900 gross value and £1,555 rateable value were agreed. A further proposal of October 1989 was agreed for specifying nil assessment. The property was entered in the 1990 rating list as being effective from 1 January 1991. E later proposed revised value, as part of the premises were used for storage. From 19 February 1992 assessment was agreed at £54,000. In 1995 B issued certificate specifying £27 rateable value for purposes of transitional relief. E`s appeal to the local valuation tribunal dismissed. Appeal to LT upheld.