Lender entitled to possession order
Language: English Series: Times ; 2 May 1996, 38(1)Publication details: 1996Subject(s): Summary: "Bristol and West Building Society V Ellis and Another" CA 24 April 1996. "Held" where, in a claim by a lender for a warrant of possession, there was insufficient evidence to show the property could be sold within 3-5 years or the proceeds were not sufficient to cover the arrears, the court should grant an order for immediate possession.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3217-37 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 8208-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB3215-96 Possession of hotel | WB3217-27 Business rates | WB3217-35 Duty of care | WB3217-37 Lender entitled to possession order | WB3217-46 Agricultural property | WB3218-20 Secure tenancy | WB3218-29 Appurtenance |
"Bristol and West Building Society V Ellis and Another" CA 24 April 1996. "Held" where, in a claim by a lender for a warrant of possession, there was insufficient evidence to show the property could be sold within 3-5 years or the proceeds were not sufficient to cover the arrears, the court should grant an order for immediate possession.