Communal aerial and satellite dish facility
Language: English Series: Journal of Planning and Environment Law ; November 1995, 997-1001(5)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: Examines in detail the reasons behind an appeal decision that concluded a communal aerial and satellite dish facility was not a reasonable requirement on a low-cost housing development. The dispute was between Horsham DC and Higgs and Hill Homes.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS54061 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 8211-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Examines in detail the reasons behind an appeal decision that concluded a communal aerial and satellite dish facility was not a reasonable requirement on a low-cost housing development. The dispute was between Horsham DC and Higgs and Hill Homes.