Image from Google Jackets

Reigate and Banstead BC and Wray

Language: English Series: Planning Appeal Decisions ; [1997] 12 PAD 332-342(11)Publication details: 1997Subject(s): Summary: Hearing 4 June 1997. Enforcement notices-use of agricultural land for storage/parking, breaking and repair of motor vehicles-first decision letter remitted by High Court to SoS for re-hearing and re-determination-unit of occupation-composite use-planning unit-accuracy of description of breach-whether possible to correct allegations in notices without injustice-deemed applications-Structure and Local Plans-character and appearance of area-visual and residential amenities-traffic generation-access-external storage-conditions-requirements of notices-compliance period. Costs-whether Council had been unreasonable in not withdrawing 1991 notices and relying on earlier notices. Taken from headnote.

Hearing 4 June 1997. Enforcement notices-use of agricultural land for storage/parking, breaking and repair of motor vehicles-first decision letter remitted by High Court to SoS for re-hearing and re-determination-unit of occupation-composite use-planning unit-accuracy of description of breach-whether possible to correct allegations in notices without injustice-deemed applications-Structure and Local Plans-character and appearance of area-visual and residential amenities-traffic generation-access-external storage-conditions-requirements of notices-compliance period. Costs-whether Council had been unreasonable in not withdrawing 1991 notices and relying on earlier notices. Taken from headnote.