The implications behind some of the recent case law affecting land
Language: English Series: Farmland Market ; (48) Autumn 1997, 18-19(2)Publication details: 1997Subject(s):- PROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-TENANCIES-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES
- DAVIES V H & R ECROYD LTD
- EARL D`KERLAST
- FARM BUILDINGS
- HARRIES V BARCLAYS BANK
- JOHN V GEORGE AND ANOTHER
- MILK QUOTAS
- NOTICE TO QUIT
- WACE V BOURKE
- WALLACE V C BRIAN BARRETT & SON LTD
- YEANDLE V RYEGATE AND BANSTEAD BC AND ANOTHER
- RURAL PRACTICE
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS57679 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 80882-1001 |
Reviews recent case law concerning farmland. Highlights contentious points. Includes milk quota decisions. "Harries v Barclays Bank plc" where a bank having appointed a receiver sold the dairy herd. The claim was that the legal charge did not extend to the quota; appeal dismissed. "Wace v Bourke" concerns the structuring of arrangements for retirement and the disposal of milk quota. "Davies v H & R Ecroyd Ltd" which decided that milk quota was not an asset of the partnership. "Earl D`Kerlast" a decision on the legal formalities behind a transaction which concluded that the arrangement amounted to a form of illicit quota leasing.