Tenant`s timetable mandatory
Language: English Series: Times ; 11/6/91 p35Publication details: 1991Subject(s): Summary: In Mayhew v Free Grammar School of John Lyon CA 21 May 1991, the CA upheld the principle that the timetable laid down in Housing Act 1974 Sched 8 to facilitate a tenant to apply for the rateable value of the premises to be reduced in order to purchase the freehold under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 was mandatory . Therefore, a tenant who is out of time and having been refused an extension of time by the cc, could not initiate the procedure over again by serving a second notice.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2723-26 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 8399-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
In Mayhew v Free Grammar School of John Lyon CA 21 May 1991, the CA upheld the principle that the timetable laid down in Housing Act 1974 Sched 8 to facilitate a tenant to apply for the rateable value of the premises to be reduced in order to purchase the freehold under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 was mandatory . Therefore, a tenant who is out of time and having been refused an extension of time by the cc, could not initiate the procedure over again by serving a second notice.