Curtis v London Rent Assessment Committee and others
Language: English Series: All England Law Reports ; [1997] 4 All ER 842-870(29)Publication details: 1997Subject(s): Summary: CA 9 October 1997. C owned two flats for which fair rents were determined in 1993. In 1995 C referred the assessment of rents to R, relying on seven nearby market comparables. R accepted four of these, but concluded by having regard to the 1993 rents and their own general knowledge of comparable registered rents, that an earlier rent officer`s registration to be held. C`s appeal allowed and R`s decision quashed, but with the judge finding that R could have reasonably come to their decision but that the reasons given were inadequate. C appealed, contending that the judge`s reasoning was wrong. Appeal allowed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS58078 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 82908-1001 |
CA 9 October 1997. C owned two flats for which fair rents were determined in 1993. In 1995 C referred the assessment of rents to R, relying on seven nearby market comparables. R accepted four of these, but concluded by having regard to the 1993 rents and their own general knowledge of comparable registered rents, that an earlier rent officer`s registration to be held. C`s appeal allowed and R`s decision quashed, but with the judge finding that R could have reasonably come to their decision but that the reasons given were inadequate. C appealed, contending that the judge`s reasoning was wrong. Appeal allowed.