Mitchell v Fearnley (VO)
Language: English Series: Rating & Valuation Reporter ; [1997] RVR 259-260(2)Publication details: 1997Subject(s): Summary: LT 31 October 1997. Ratepayer M held an underlease on a purpose built lock-up shop which was incorporated in a shopping mall. Refurbishment of the mall meant that M experienced difficulties in using the rear loading bay of the property as members of the public also used it for access. M contended an end allowance of 27%. "Held" end allowance should be allowed at 5%.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS58107 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 82939-1001 |
LT 31 October 1997. Ratepayer M held an underlease on a purpose built lock-up shop which was incorporated in a shopping mall. Refurbishment of the mall meant that M experienced difficulties in using the rear loading bay of the property as members of the public also used it for access. M contended an end allowance of 27%. "Held" end allowance should be allowed at 5%.