Church Commissioners for England v Baines; Ebied and another v Hopkins and another; Wellcome Trust Ltd v Hammad
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (9802) 10 January 1998, 121-127(7)Publication details: 1998Subject(s): Summary: CA 30 July 1997. In each of the appeals the premises consisted of a shop or business premises with residential floors above. Each had been the subject of a headlease protected by the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Part II with subtenancies protected by the Rent Act 1977 of the residential parts held by the respective appellant subtenants. Upon the determination of each of the headleases, orders of possession were made against the subtenants upon the applications of the freeholders. The subtenants appealed contending that by reason of the Rent Act 1977 s137(3) they had the protection of the Act against the freeholders. Appeals allowed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS58191 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 83297-1001 |
CA 30 July 1997. In each of the appeals the premises consisted of a shop or business premises with residential floors above. Each had been the subject of a headlease protected by the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Part II with subtenancies protected by the Rent Act 1977 of the residential parts held by the respective appellant subtenants. Upon the determination of each of the headleases, orders of possession were made against the subtenants upon the applications of the freeholders. The subtenants appealed contending that by reason of the Rent Act 1977 s137(3) they had the protection of the Act against the freeholders. Appeals allowed.