To name or not to name?
Language: English Series: Building ; 263(8026) 13 February 1998, 38(1)Publication details: 1998Subject(s):- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATORS
- DISPUTE RESOLUTION
- HOUSING GRANTS CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996
- SCHEME FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS
- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS58239 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 84281-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Under the new Construction Act parties involved in disputes have the right to go to adjudication. This article argues the case for and against naming the adjudicator in the contract.