Scarlett v Halcrow Ltd
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (1995) 11 EG 145-148(4)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: LVT 14 November 1995. S wished to purchase a block of 10 flats and sought a determination of price from the court, proposing a sum of £3,000. H replied with a notice for £30,000 or £15,000 plus leaseback of the roof area for further development. "Held" that the price should be £1,500, there being no neighbouring property for which the landlord would be compensatable under the Leashold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993; there being no marriage value; and as permission for development would be refused, there was no loss of development value.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS52550 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 84286-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
LVT 14 November 1995. S wished to purchase a block of 10 flats and sought a determination of price from the court, proposing a sum of £3,000. H replied with a notice for £30,000 or £15,000 plus leaseback of the roof area for further development. "Held" that the price should be £1,500, there being no neighbouring property for which the landlord would be compensatable under the Leashold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993; there being no marriage value; and as permission for development would be refused, there was no loss of development value.