Extend or franchise - the Housing and Planning Act 1986 amendments
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; 283(6348) 22 August 1987, 838-51(3)Publication details: 1987Subject(s): Summary: The Court of Appeal in Mosley v Hickman (1986) (See Abstract 36337) confirmed the Land Tribunal`s finding that tenants in the higher rateable value band enfranchising without first extending a lease would be required to pay considerably more for the freehold than those who had first exercised the right to an extended lease . The Housing and Planning Act 1986 s23 amended the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 s9 (1A) to exclude the effect of the Hickman approach and this article discusses the implications of this amendment, highlighting the anomalies which still exist.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS38073 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 8573-1001 |
The Court of Appeal in Mosley v Hickman (1986) (See Abstract 36337) confirmed the Land Tribunal`s finding that tenants in the higher rateable value band enfranchising without first extending a lease would be required to pay considerably more for the freehold than those who had first exercised the right to an extended lease . The Housing and Planning Act 1986 s23 amended the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 s9 (1A) to exclude the effect of the Hickman approach and this article discusses the implications of this amendment, highlighting the anomalies which still exist.