Pardoe v Pennington

Language: English Series: Property, planning & compensation reports ; (3) 1998 PCR, 264-272(9)Publication details: 1998Subject(s):

Summary: CA 7 November 1997. Houses owned by plaintiff (P) and second defendant. P placed cess-pit on bridleway in belief or hope that she owned it. Dispute over ownership of bridleway on frontage of properties. Whether presumption "ad medium filum" rebutted. Appeal dismissed. Family agreement did not intend the whole bridleway to belong to estate.

Holdings ( 1 )
Title notes ( 1 )

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Call number	Copy number	Status	Barcode
Law report	London Journal article	ABS58641 (Browse shelf(Opens below))	1	Available	85625-1001

Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	Next
Previous	ABS58636 Conveyancing: code for completion	ABS58639 Reform of the law of the tenement	ABS58640 Water privatisation: ownership disputes and liability	ABS58641 Pardoe v Pennington	ABS58643 Close brackets	ABS58644 Compensation where no land is taken	ABS58645 Shipley decision rocks landlords` boat	Next

CA 7 November 1997. Houses owned by plaintiff (P) and second defendant. P placed cess-pit on bridleway in belief or hope that she owned it. Dispute over ownership of bridleway on frontage of properties. Whether presumption "ad medium filum" rebutted. Appeal dismissed. Family agreement did not intend the whole bridleway to belong to estate.

Back to results

Print
Cite
Send to device
Save record
BIBTEX Dublin Core MARCXML MARC (non-Unicode/MARC-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8, Standard) MODS (XML) RIS ISBD
More searches

Search for this title in:
Other Libraries (WorldCat) Other Databases (Google Scholar) Open Library (openlibrary.org)