Implying terms in building contracts
Language: English Series: Building Design ; (793) 27 June 1986, (794) 4 July 1986, 14-16(3)Publication details: 1986Subject(s): Summary: Discusses the recent decision in "Stanley hugh Leach Ltd v London Borough of Merton" ChD 30 December 1985, an appeal from previous award by arbitrator whereby the plaintiff contractor based his claim under the relevant clauses of JCT 1963 (1971 revision), on lack of proper information from the defendant borough`s architect.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS36559 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 85756-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Discusses the recent decision in "Stanley hugh Leach Ltd v London Borough of Merton" ChD 30 December 1985, an appeal from previous award by arbitrator whereby the plaintiff contractor based his claim under the relevant clauses of JCT 1963 (1971 revision), on lack of proper information from the defendant borough`s architect.