A long and painful fight
Language: English Series: Building ; 263(14) 3 April 1998, 27(1)Publication details: 1998Subject(s): Summary: Discusses the question in "Alfred McAlpine Construction Ltd v Panatown Ltd", a dispute alleging a defective office building, whether the rule that a party cannot recover compensation when the loss has been suffered not by that party, but by a third party unconnected with the contract, can be modified by looking at the parties roles within the contract.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS58520 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 85990-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Discusses the question in "Alfred McAlpine Construction Ltd v Panatown Ltd", a dispute alleging a defective office building, whether the rule that a party cannot recover compensation when the loss has been suffered not by that party, but by a third party unconnected with the contract, can be modified by looking at the parties roles within the contract.