Bogdal v Kingston Upon Hull CC
Language: English Series: Rating Appeals ; [1998] 3 RA 44-52(5)Publication details: 1998Subject(s): Summary: QBD 9 February 1998. B contended that the dwelling he lived in with his mother and another lady was a small residential care home as defined by the Registered Homes Act 1984, and should thus be subject to a 50% discount in council tax. The valuation tribunal found that it should be treated as a domestic dwelling. Appeal dismissed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS58804 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 86232-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
QBD 9 February 1998. B contended that the dwelling he lived in with his mother and another lady was a small residential care home as defined by the Registered Homes Act 1984, and should thus be subject to a 50% discount in council tax. The valuation tribunal found that it should be treated as a domestic dwelling. Appeal dismissed.