R v Dudley Magistrates` Court ex parte Hollis; Hollis v Dudley MBC; Probert v Dudley MBC
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; [1998] 18 EG 133-138(6)Publication details: 1998Subject(s): Summary: QBD 25 November 1997. H and P served notice on D of intention to bring proceedings against them if necessary remedial works were not carried out within 21 days to rectify a statutory nuisance. D promptly replied to say that the works would take longer than 21 days. Shortly after the expiry of this period, H and P commenced proceedings. Their costs were disallowed on the grounds that they had failed to give D proper opportunity to complete the works, and had acted unreasonably in their action. H and P`s appeal was allowed, and judicial review on adjournment of the case granted.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS58792 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 86380-1001 |
QBD 25 November 1997. H and P served notice on D of intention to bring proceedings against them if necessary remedial works were not carried out within 21 days to rectify a statutory nuisance. D promptly replied to say that the works would take longer than 21 days. Shortly after the expiry of this period, H and P commenced proceedings. Their costs were disallowed on the grounds that they had failed to give D proper opportunity to complete the works, and had acted unreasonably in their action. H and P`s appeal was allowed, and judicial review on adjournment of the case granted.