Crean Davidson Investments Ltd v Earl Cadogan and another
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; [1998] 20 EG 136-138(3), (16/05/98)Publication details: 1998Subject(s): Summary: Central London CC, 11 December 1997. C acted for sublessees of flats in serving a section 13 notice under the Leasehold Reform and Housing Development Act 1993 for collective enfranchisement of the property. Landlords E did not accept the notice of claim was valid because 1) there was no proposed purchase price or reversionary interest in the headlease, 2) the headlease was a qualifying tenant, and as only two of the three subleassees made application, the necessary two thirds application had not been met. Held, application valid.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS58743 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 86599-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Central London CC, 11 December 1997. C acted for sublessees of flats in serving a section 13 notice under the Leasehold Reform and Housing Development Act 1993 for collective enfranchisement of the property. Landlords E did not accept the notice of claim was valid because 1) there was no proposed purchase price or reversionary interest in the headlease, 2) the headlease was a qualifying tenant, and as only two of the three subleassees made application, the necessary two thirds application had not been met. Held, application valid.