Issuing a writ won`t terminate a lease
Language: English Series: Property Week ; 63(8) 5 June 1998, 44(1)Publication details: 1998Subject(s): Summary: Reviews the two recent cases of "Maryland Estates v Joseph" and "Ivory Gate Limited v Spatale", where the CA has affirmed the rule that the issue and service of a writ or county court summons seeking possession of property on the ground of forfeiture does not actually determine the lease.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS58908 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 86955-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Reviews the two recent cases of "Maryland Estates v Joseph" and "Ivory Gate Limited v Spatale", where the CA has affirmed the rule that the issue and service of a writ or county court summons seeking possession of property on the ground of forfeiture does not actually determine the lease.