Protecting subsequent owners
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; 283(6350) 5 September 1987, 1028-1030(2)Publication details: 1987Subject(s): Summary: With reference to two cases, D & F Estates Ltd and Others v The Church Commissioners for England and Others (See WB2308-09) and the Department of the Environment v Thomas Bates & Sons Ltd and Another 1987 CILL p308, the author looks at the question of defects in the design and construction of buildings which became apparent a number of years after completion, and whether a subsequent purchaser, lessee or tenant of the building might find themselves in the position that their lease or tenancy agreement places a positive obligation to effect repairs or restore the building to a particular condition| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS38144 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 8906-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
With reference to two cases, D & F Estates Ltd and Others v The Church Commissioners for England and Others (See WB2308-09) and the Department of the Environment v Thomas Bates & Sons Ltd and Another 1987 CILL p308, the author looks at the question of defects in the design and construction of buildings which became apparent a number of years after completion, and whether a subsequent purchaser, lessee or tenant of the building might find themselves in the position that their lease or tenancy agreement places a positive obligation to effect repairs or restore the building to a particular condition