Right to roam less important than good footpaths
Language: English Series: CSM (Chartered Surveyor Monthly) ; July/August 1998, 7(1)Publication details: 1998Subject(s): Summary: The RICS has responded to government proposals for increased access to the countryside by stressing that good, well-marked and safe footpaths are more important to the public than the theoretical right to roam. (Copies of the RICS response are available from the Press Office on 0171 222 7000)| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB3428-20 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 87602-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: News article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
The RICS has responded to government proposals for increased access to the countryside by stressing that good, well-marked and safe footpaths are more important to the public than the theoretical right to roam. (Copies of the RICS response are available from the Press Office on 0171 222 7000)