Image from Google Jackets

R v Dudley Magistrates Court, ex p Hollis; Hollis v Dudley MDC; Probert v Dudley Metropolitan Council

Language: English Series: Journal of Planning and Environment Law ; [1998] JPL 652-664(13)Publication details: 1998Subject(s): Summary: QBD 25 November 1997. Local authority tenants - complaints laid under s82 EPA 90 alleging statutory nuisance - Council indicated works would be undertaken but not within required timescale - tenants costs of proceedings disallowed in Magistrates Court - appeal by way of case stated - application for judicial review of magistrates decision to adjourn - interpretation of s82(12) EPA 1990 - Court not entitled to refuse costs on grounds that complaints unreasonably laid - adjournment could not be granted to avoid the consequences the law provided would follow should the hearing proceed - appeal aand application allowed.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report London Journal article X93058 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 87607-1001

QBD 25 November 1997. Local authority tenants - complaints laid under s82 EPA 90 alleging statutory nuisance - Council indicated works would be undertaken but not within required timescale - tenants costs of proceedings disallowed in Magistrates Court - appeal by way of case stated - application for judicial review of magistrates decision to adjourn - interpretation of s82(12) EPA 1990 - Court not entitled to refuse costs on grounds that complaints unreasonably laid - adjournment could not be granted to avoid the consequences the law provided would follow should the hearing proceed - appeal aand application allowed.