Cat-in-the box paradox of expiring tenancies
Language: English Series: Property Week ; 63(13) 17 July 1998, 34(1)Publication details: 1998Subject(s): Summary: Considers the provisions of Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Part II, relating to a tenant`s occupation of premises for business purposes. Discusses the conflicting court decisions in "Esselte v Pearl Assurance" and "Bacchiochi v Academic Agency".| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS59072 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 87708-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Considers the provisions of Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Part II, relating to a tenant`s occupation of premises for business purposes. Discusses the conflicting court decisions in "Esselte v Pearl Assurance" and "Bacchiochi v Academic Agency".