R v East Hertfordshire DC ex parte Beckman
Language: English Series: Property and Compensation Reports ; [1998] 76 P&CR 333-337(5)Publication details: 1998Subject(s): Summary: QBD 26 July 1997. Local planning authority H granted planning permission on land where two previous identical applications had been refused. The difference this time, H claimed, was that it had a letter of approval of security from the police. This was infact incorrect as the letter existed at the time of the previous application. A judicial review sought be an adjoining landowner to quash the decision was allowed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS59524 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 88985-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
QBD 26 July 1997. Local planning authority H granted planning permission on land where two previous identical applications had been refused. The difference this time, H claimed, was that it had a letter of approval of security from the police. This was infact incorrect as the letter existed at the time of the previous application. A judicial review sought be an adjoining landowner to quash the decision was allowed.