Look back in anger
Language: English Series: Contract Journal ; 378(6019) 6 April 1995, 15(1)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: Considers "Sheffield v Conrad" (1987) and the defence for non-payment. After the employer had terminated the contract a defect was found, which was caused by the premature removal of props at the time of the termination. It was held that the employer could not use this retrospective knowledge of the builder`s action to justify termination.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS52656 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 88992-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Considers "Sheffield v Conrad" (1987) and the defence for non-payment. After the employer had terminated the contract a defect was found, which was caused by the premature removal of props at the time of the termination. It was held that the employer could not use this retrospective knowledge of the builder`s action to justify termination.