Boundary dispute
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; [1998] EGCS 166, (1) (28/11/98)Publication details: 1998Subject(s): Summary: "Reed v Graham" CA 17 November 1998. A judge is expected to take in to account all evidence in a boundary dispute when an initial order is ambiguous.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3446-35 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 90052-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB3445-37 Acquisition by tenants | WB3445-44 Damages | WB3446-21 Damages for breach of contract | WB3446-35 Boundary dispute | WB3446-36 Covenant expenses not deductable | WB3446-37 Duty of care | WB3501-45 Option to buy reversion |
"Reed v Graham" CA 17 November 1998. A judge is expected to take in to account all evidence in a boundary dispute when an initial order is ambiguous.