Put option
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; 1993 EGCS 142(1) 31/7/93Publication details: 1993Subject(s): Summary: In "Milton Keynes Development Corporation v Cooper (GB Ltd) and another" ChD 20 July 1993, decided that the assignee in an underlease was not entitled to exercise a put option as there had been no exchange of contracts.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB2930-47 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 90365-1001 |
Browsing London shelves, Shelving location: Journal article Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| WB2930-32 Easement: right of way | WB2930-41 Mortgage: order for possession | WB2930-42 Property: joint tenancy | WB2930-47 Put option | WB2930-48 Right to buy | WB2930-59 Procedure: giving reasons | WB2931-47 Relief from forfeiture |
In "Milton Keynes Development Corporation v Cooper (GB Ltd) and another" ChD 20 July 1993, decided that the assignee in an underlease was not entitled to exercise a put option as there had been no exchange of contracts.